Skip to main content

Security & governance

Guardrails and Safer Autonomy

Guardrails keep agents within agreed limits: policy checks before actions, approval thresholds for sensitive steps and stop conditions when something is uncertain.

Conceptual agent action passing an access gate, a human approval checkpoint and an audit log, with one action stopped at a lock, linked by purple particles.

Types of guardrails

Combined according to the risk of each action.

Policy checks

Validate inputs and proposed actions against agreed rules before anything is written.

Approval thresholds

Require a person above a value, risk level or confidence limit.

Stop conditions

Pause and hand over when information is missing or answers conflict.

How guardrails are designed

Proportionate to the impact of each action.

01

List actions

Every action the agent may take.

02

Rate impact

What could go wrong and how reversible it is.

03

Set controls

Checks, approvals and stop conditions per action.

04

Test failures

Try edge cases before launch.

Autonomy is earned, not assumed

Actions can move from approval to automatic only with evidence and your agreement.

  • Start sensitive actions with human approval.
  • Review outcomes before relaxing a threshold.
  • Changes to instructions or tools are approved before rollout.

Common questions

No. Changes to instructions, tools or thresholds are made by people, tested and approved before release.

The action is held and the case goes to the agreed person or queue with the reason.

We choose the model and provider for each task during scoping, based on the language, accuracy, latency and data-handling requirements. The workflow is not tied to one provider, so a step can be changed later if the agreed requirements change.

Discovery call

Start with the work that slows you down.

Bring us a process, a recurring enquiry or a pile of documents. We will explore where agents fit and what a useful implementation needs.

Book a discovery call